Gravitational Seismology: Detecting Subterranean Density Anomalies and Pre-Eruptive Magmatic Movements using Quantum Gravimeters

Ultra-realistic painting of quantum gravimeters around a volcano detecting gravitational field changes due to magma.
Figure 1: This ultra-realistic digital painting illustrates the concept of gravitational seismology using quantum gravimeter networks positioned around a volcano. The gravimeters on the surface are depicted as detecting changes in the gravitational field as magma migrates underground, showcasing the real-time, continuous monitoring capabilities of this advanced technology. Visual indicators highlight data transmission and variations in gravitational field strengths. Set against a dusk sky, the scene combines natural volcanic features with digital elements, emphasizing the integration of cutting-edge technology in monitoring subsurface density anomalies.

Volcano monitoring is traditionally a science of proxies. Geodetic stations track ground deformation, seismometers listen for the fracturing of rock, and gas sensors measure surface emissions. While invaluable, these methods monitor the effects of subsurface magma movement, not the movement itself. This paradigm often leaves volcanologists in a reactive position, interpreting signals that may occur perilously close to an eruption. A critical gap exists in our ability to directly and continuously track the silent, slow ascent and accumulation of magma—the fundamental drivers of volcanic unrest.

This article proposes a new conceptual framework: Gravitational Seismology. This approach utilizes networks of emerging quantum gravimeters to move beyond tracking discrete seismic events and instead image the continuous, evolving gravitational field of a volcano. By measuring minuscule fluctuations in local gravity with unprecedented precision and stability, these instruments can detect the migration of magma, the exsolution of gases, and the development of subterranean density anomalies long before they trigger conventional seismic or deformation signals. This represents a paradigm shift from monitoring a volcano’s symptoms to directly observing its physiological changes, offering the potential for earlier, more reliable eruption forecasting.

The Limitations of Classical Monitoring

Conventional volcano monitoring relies on a triad of techniques: seismology, geodesy (GPS), and geochemistry. Seismometers excel at detecting brittle failure, the earthquakes caused by rock fracturing under stress, but they are often blind to the slow, ductile movement of magma through a plumbing system. GPS networks are superb at measuring surface deformation, the swelling or subsidence of the volcano’s edifice, but they cannot uniquely distinguish between different subsurface drivers; for instance, uplift can be caused by the intrusion of dense magma or the pressurization of a less dense, gas-rich fluid. Classical gravimeters, which measure changes in gravity, can in principle distinguish between these scenarios. However, traditional spring-based and even superconducting gravimeters are susceptible to instrumental drift and environmental noise, limiting their long-term stability and making it difficult to resolve subtle, precursory signals from the background noise (Riccardi et al., 2024). These limitations mean that our picture of a volcano's inner workings is often assembled from fragmented, indirect evidence, creating ambiguity at critical moments.

Four-panel illustration showing limitations of classical volcano monitoring methods: seismic readings missing weak signals, GPS inaccuracies, spring-based gravimeter noise issues, and undetected silent magma movement.
Figure 2: This visualization offers a comparative panorama highlighting the limitations of classical volcano monitoring techniques. The first panel illustrates seismic monitoring with seismograph signals, unable to capture weak, subtle indicators of magma movement. The second panel demonstrates GPS-based monitoring, where surface deformation data doesn't account for deeper, silent magma flows, leading to misinterpretations. The third panel showcases a spring-based gravimeter registering gravitational changes, yet cluttered with background noise and drift issues, which obscure significant readings. The final panel presents the challenge of detecting silent magma movements with traditional tools against a backdrop of noisy data, emphasizing the need for enhanced monitoring technologies. The use of dark backgrounds and neon markers elucidates the scientific data, while annotations provide clear context for each method's limitations.

Quantum Gravimeters: The Dawn of Absolute Gravimetry

Quantum gravimeters, specifically those based on cold-atom interferometry, represent a breakthrough in geophysical instrumentation. These devices operate by using lasers to trap and cool clouds of atoms to near absolute zero. The atoms are then released into a freefall within a vacuum chamber and their trajectory is measured with extreme precision using atom interferometry. Because the acceleration of the atoms is directly tied to the local gravitational field, the measurement is absolute, meaning it is inherently calibrated to a fundamental constant of nature and does not suffer from the long-term drift that plagues mechanical systems (Ménoret et al., 2018).

Recent technological advances have produced transportable quantum gravimeters capable of continuous, field-based measurements with stabilities below 10 nm/s² (1 μGal), a level of precision sufficient to detect minute subsurface mass changes (Ménoret et al., 2018). Furthermore, the development of quantum gravity gradiometers, which measure the spatial gradient of the gravitational field, offers even greater sensitivity to near-surface density anomalies while simultaneously rejecting environmental noise sources like micro-seismic vibrations that affect all instruments at a site (Stray et al., 2021). This combination of absolute accuracy, high sensitivity, and robustness unlocks the ability to perform continuous 4D (3D space + time) mapping of a volcano’s plumbing system.

3D render of cold atoms in free fall being measured by intersecting lasers in a vacuum chamber, displaying their interferometric patterns.
Figure 3: This 3D render illustrates the mechanism of a quantum gravimeter using cold-atom interferometry. Atoms are released from a magneto-optical trap into free fall within a vacuum chamber. Intersecting laser beams measure the trajectory and interferometric patterns of these atoms, providing precise gravimetric data. The visual emphasizes how the intrinsic laser paths create a non-drifting measurement environment, harnessing quantum principles for absolute gravimetric accuracy. The futuristic lab setting reflects innovative scientific exploration within quantum physics.

From Theory to Forecast: Imaging Pre-Eruptive Processes

A network of quantum gravimeters would enable a form of "gravitational seismology" capable of imaging processes that are currently invisible. By providing a continuous, high-fidelity data stream of mass-change, these networks could revolutionize our understanding of pre-eruptive sequences.

One of the most critical challenges in volcanology is distinguishing between intrusions that will stall and those that will erupt. A key factor is the interplay between magma recharge and gas exsolution. Joint analysis of deformation and gravity data at Mount Etna has shown that a significant mass decrease, incompatible with simple magma withdrawal, can be explained by pressure-driven gas expansion buffering the contraction of the magma reservoir (Carbone et al., 2023). While this was identified retrospectively using classical methods, a network of quantum gravimeters could track these countervailing processes in near real-time. The high temporal resolution could detect the subtle gravitational signature of deep magma recharge (an increase in mass) versus the shallower gravitational decrease associated with gas separating from the melt, providing a direct diagnostic of the system’s state and eruptive potential.

Furthermore, deploying arrays of quantum gravity gradiometers would allow for high-resolution inversion modeling to pinpoint the location and geometry of moving magma bodies. Current inversion techniques are often limited by the sparsity and noise of the input data (Vajda et al., 2022). A dense network of drift-free, high-precision sensors would provide the high-quality data needed to track a batch of ascending magma, much like how seismic networks track earthquake hypocenters. This would allow for the direct observation of magma migrating from a deep storage zone to a shallow, pre-eruptive reservoir, a critical step that often precedes major eruptions (Greco et al., 2022).

Network of quantum gravimeters around a volcano showing magma and gas movements beneath the surface, with data visualization grids.
Figure 4: This digital concept illustration visualizes an advanced network of quantum gravimeters positioned strategically around a volcano to monitor pre-eruptive magmatic processes. The image depicts the magma chamber with rising magma and gas clouds, highlighted with dynamic, bright colors to represent motion and energy. 3D grid lines and vectors illustrate the gravimeters' data inversion process, mapping the migration paths of magma and gas exsolution in the subsurface. The illustration combines a split composition to show both the volcanic surface, marked by fiery tones, and the subterranean structure, blending warmer volcanic imagery with cooler, scientific elements of data visualization. This visualization captures the integration of cutting-edge quantum technology in monitoring and understanding volcanic activity.

Conclusion

Gravitational seismology, powered by quantum gravimeters, offers a transformative path forward for eruption forecasting. It promises to shift the focus from interpreting the secondary effects of volcanic unrest to directly imaging the primary driver: the movement of magma and fluids. By providing a continuous, unambiguous record of mass redistribution, this approach could identify pre-eruptive signals far earlier and with greater confidence than is currently possible. This would allow for the detection of "silent" magma intrusions, the real-time quantification of gas build-up, and a more robust assessment of eruptive likelihood.

The realization of this vision requires continued progress in the miniaturization and cost-reduction of quantum sensors to allow for the deployment of dense networks. Alongside hardware development, a new generation of inversion algorithms must be created to fully exploit the richness of 4D gravity gradient data. While challenging, the prospect of directly watching the subterranean heart of a volcano awaken makes this one of the most vital frontiers in modern geoscience and hazard mitigation.

References

  • Carbone, D., Cannavò, F., Montagna, C. P., & Greco, F. (2023). Gas buffering of magma chamber contraction during persistent explosive activity at Mt. Etna volcano. Communications Earth & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01149-x
  • Greco, F., Bonforte, A., & Carbone, D. (2022). A long-term charge/discharge cycle at Mt. Etna volcano revealed through absolute gravity and GPS measurements. Journal of Geodesy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01692-z
  • Greco, F., Carbone, D., Cannavò, F., Messina, A. A., & Siligato, G. (2020). Absolute and Relative Gravity Measurements at Volcanoes: Current State and New Developments Under the NEWTON-g Project. 5th Symposium on Terrestrial Gravimetry: Static and Mobile Measurements (TG-SMM 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2020_126
  • Heine, N., Matthias, J., Sahelgozin, M., Herr, W., Abend, S., Timmen, L., Müller, J., & Rasel, E. M. (2020). A transportable quantum gravimeter employing delta-kick collimated Bose–Einstein condensates. The European Physical Journal D. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2020-10120-x
  • Ménoret, V., Vermeulen, P., Le Moigne, N., Bonvalot, S., Bouyer, P., Landragin, A., & Desruelle, B. (2018). Gravity measurements below 10−9 g with a transportable absolute quantum gravimeter. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30608-1
  • Migliaccio, F., Reguzzoni, M., Rosi, G., Braitenberg, C., Tino, G. M., Sorrentino, F., Mottini, S., Rossi, L., Koç, Ö., Batsukh, K., Pivetta, T., Pastorutti, A., & Zoffoli, S. (2022). The MOCAST+ Study on a Quantum Gradiometry Satellite Mission with Atomic Clocks. Surveys in Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09760-x
  • Riccardi, U., Pivetta, T., Fedele, A., Ricciardi, G., & Carlino, S. (2024). Continuous Gravity Observations at Campi Flegrei Caldera: An Accurate Assessment of Tidal and Non-Tidal Signals and Implications for Volcano Monitoring. Pure and Applied Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03555-4
  • Stray, B., Lamb, A., Kaushik, A., Vovrosh, J., Rodgers, A., Winch, J., Hayati, F., Boddice, D., Stabrawa, A., Niggebaum, A., Langlois, M., Lien, Y.-H., Lellouch, S., Roshanmanesh, S., Ridley, K., Villiers, G., Brown, G., Cross, T., Tuckwell, G., Faramarzi, A., Metje, N., Bongs, K., & Holynski, M. (2022). Quantum sensing for gravity cartography. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04315-3
  • Vajda, P., Camacho, A. G., & Fernández, J. (2022). Benefits and Limitations of the Growth Inversion Approach in Volcano Gravimetry Demonstrated on the Revisited 2004–2005 Tenerife Unrest. Surveys in Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09738-9